HackerRank proctoring vs competitors: AI skills evaluation security

HackerRank's proctoring combines AI-powered plagiarism detection with multi-layered security controls, achieving 93% accuracy in detecting unauthorized AI usage and code copying. The platform's three-tier system—from browser controls to OS-level lockdown—provides enterprise-grade assessment integrity while maintaining candidate experience, leading Fortune 100 companies to adopt it for technical hiring at scale.

At a Glance

• HackerRank's plagiarism detection achieves 93% accuracy, three times more effective than traditional code similarity methods

• Three security tiers available: Secure Mode (browser controls), Proctor Mode (AI monitoring), and Desktop App Mode (OS-level lockdown)

HackerRank successfully detected InterviewCoder cheating attempts with 0.99+ confidence scores across all test questions

• Platform reduced Red Hat's live technical interviews by over 60% through automated candidate screening

• Competitors like ProctorU and Proctorio face criticism for high false positive rates and technical issues during assessments

• Session replay feature provides visual evidence of violations, creating what HackerRank calls "courtroom-ready" documentation

HackerRank proctoring protects remote coding tests from cheating and identity fraud, crucial as AI-native skills evaluations replace in-person exams. With the rise of remote hiring and sophisticated AI tools that candidates can use to game assessments, secure and scalable proctoring has become essential for both developers seeking fair evaluation and hiring teams needing trustworthy results.

Why Does Proctoring Matter in AI-Native Skills Evaluations?

Proctoring is the act of supervising or monitoring candidates during an assessment to ensure they're adhering to guidelines and not engaging in dishonest behavior like cheating. As remote proctoring services have evolved, they've become a key component of online and remote learning, providing the means for verifying student identity and preventing unauthorized support.

The shift to remote technical assessments has fundamentally changed the stakes. Technical skills assessment platforms now assist recruiting teams in expediting the interviewing and hiring of qualified candidates for technical roles, particularly in industries heavily invested in software development. The challenge? Traditional plagiarism detection methods struggle against AI-generated code, and manual proctoring can't scale to meet enterprise hiring demands.

Consider the numbers: online cheating cases have risen by over 50% since 2020, while companies need to evaluate thousands of candidates simultaneously. The average job posting yields more than 100 candidates, making robust, automated proctoring essential for maintaining assessment integrity at scale.

What Is HackerRank's Integrity Stack?

HackerRank's Integrity Stack helps create a level playing field by ensuring candidates adhere to assessment policies through three core components: Prevent, Detect, and Verify. The platform layers browser controls, AI-powered monitoring, and operating system-level lockdown to create what the company calls "courtroom-ready evidence."

The stack operates at three escalating security levels. Secure Mode runs tests in a controlled browser environment, enforcing full-screen mode, blocking copy and paste actions, preventing the use of multiple monitors, and alerting when candidates switch tabs. Proctor Mode includes all Secure Mode capabilities and adds AI-powered features such as screenshot analysis, plagiarism detection, and webcam anomaly detection. HackerRank Desktop App Mode includes all Proctor Mode capabilities and adds operating system-level monitoring to create a fully locked-down environment.

The AI Plagiarism Detection feature ensures fairness and helps hire the right developers with a plagiarism model that's 93% accurate. This proprietary model analyzes behavioral signals and code similarity to surface high-confidence plagiarism flags, going beyond simple code matching to detect patterns that indicate unauthorized AI usage.

Secure Mode

Secure Mode maintains assessment integrity through browser-level controls that create a controlled testing environment. Full-screen enforcement prevents candidates from minimizing or resizing the test window, while tab switch alerts warn candidates when they attempt to navigate away from the test.

The system blocks external copy and paste actions during the test, ensuring candidates rely on their own knowledge rather than pre-written solutions. When proctoring HackerRank tests, copy/paste tracking is enabled by default, monitoring candidates' external copy-pasting activities to identify potential cheating behaviors.

Desktop App Mode

Desktop App Mode provides the highest level of integrity controls available on the HackerRank platform. The system prevents candidates from sharing remote access to their systems, taking screenshots, or sharing their screen during assessments.

It blocks the use of other applications during the test, including tools such as Cluely, video conferencing, messaging applications, or LLM applications. The desktop app also prevents the test from running on a virtual machine and evaluates violations across two areas: webcam images and coding behavior, providing comprehensive post-test reports.

How HackerRank's AI Proctor Mode Mimics a Human Proctor

Proctor Mode acts like having a human proctor for take-home assessments. It sets test instructions, detects suspicious activity in real time, and submits a comprehensive report that includes a full-session replay. If suspicious activity is detected, the Proctor immediately notifies the candidate and requests an explanation.

The system monitors for violations during the test, including behaviors such as tab switching, use of unauthorized tools, or face detection anomalies, and intervenes when necessary. This AI-powered feature simulates live human proctoring to help ensure test integrity without the complexity of manual oversight.

HackerRank tested its Proctor Mode against InterviewCoder, an AI tool marketed as an "invisible interview co-pilot." The results were decisive: the platform's AI plagiarism detection successfully flagged the candidate for plagiarism in all three questions with a confidence score above 0.99. The most unique feature of HackerRank Proctor mode is session replay, which captures screenshots of candidates using external tools, providing clear, undeniable evidence of plagiarism.

93 %-Accurate AI Plagiarism Detection

HackerRank's plagiarism detection represents a breakthrough in assessment integrity. The system is 93% accurate at detecting plagiarism, three times more accurate than traditional code similarity approaches. It can detect the use of tools like ChatGPT through enhanced code review and gets smarter over time through machine learning.

How plagiarism detection works at HackerRank involves feeding several proctoring and user-generated signals into an advanced machine-learning algorithm. The system analyzes candidate behavior, code evolution, and submission similarities to flag suspicious patterns that human reviewers might miss.

The false positive rate matters critically for candidate experience. AI monitoring experiments show that proctors rejected 50-71% of fake signals in controlled tests, with an estimated false positive rate of about 1% without human validation. This balance between detection accuracy and candidate fairness sets HackerRank apart from competitors who often trigger unnecessary alerts.

HackerRank vs. TestGorilla, ProctorU & Talview: Where Security Gaps Appear

Competitors struggle with critical security gaps that HackerRank's integrated approach addresses. TestGorilla offers essential anti-cheating tools including screenshot tracking, full-screen monitoring, and IP address tracking, but relies mainly on these basic detection methods without the advanced AI capabilities HackerRank provides.

ProctorU users report significant technical issues: "The effectiveness of the ProctorU Proctoring Platform remains questionable because of technical hitches and a poor quality AI monitoring system." Reviews consistently cite connectivity problems and platform freezing during exams, creating frustration for both candidates and hiring teams.

Compared to HackerRank's comprehensive approach, HackerEarth incorporates features like Smart Browser Proctoring and AI Snapshots but lacks the depth of HackerRank's plagiarism detection. It doesn't match HackerRank's 93% accuracy in AI-powered plagiarism detection.

Proctorio maintains 99.991% uptime but generates complaints about false positives: "Proctorio helps in maintaining the security of online exams but too many false positives negatively affect the program." Similarly, Talview's real-time monitoring faces criticism for oversensitivity: "Small movements like shifting glasses or straightening up caused problems by prompting unnecessary checks during testing time."

MIT research found that hybrid models reduced false-positive cheating alerts by 53% compared to fully automated systems. This finding underscores why HackerRank's balanced approach--combining AI detection with human review capabilities--delivers more reliable results than competitors relying on either extreme.

False-Positive Rates & Candidate Experience

False positives destroy candidate trust and create review bottlenecks for hiring teams. Research on AI detection shows that without proper calibration, AI systems can achieve detection accuracy but at the cost of flagging legitimate behavior. The estimated false positive rate of about 1% represents the upper bound in absence of human validation.

Academic analysis reveals that false positives disproportionately affect non-native English speakers and individuals with distinctive writing styles. This bias creates fairness concerns that HackerRank addresses through its multi-signal approach, which considers context beyond simple pattern matching.

Real-World Impact: Fortune-100 Adoption & Customer Results

More than 25% of the Fortune 100 employ HackerRank to help hire skilled developers, demonstrating enterprise-level trust in the platform's security features. This adoption spans industries where assessment integrity directly impacts business outcomes.

Accedia, a leading European IT services firm, transformed its recruitment through HackerRank's proctoring capabilities. Managing Partner Plamen Koychev explains: "HackerRank's proctoring features, in particular, help us monitor candidate behavior during assessments, such as detecting tab changes, tracking live code writing, and flagging suspicious activities like plagiarism." The automation allows focus on evaluating higher candidate volumes while maintaining recruitment integrity.

Red Hat achieved dramatic efficiency gains through HackerRank's integrity features. The platform disqualified 63% of phase one candidates, reducing live technical interviews by over 60%. This screening accuracy meant qualified talent moved through the pipeline faster, significantly shortening time-to-fill for critical technical roles.

Which Questions Should You Ask When Buying a Proctoring Solution?

When evaluating proctoring platforms, start with security fundamentals. How does the system protect candidate data? HackerRank uses 256-bit AES encryption, intrusion prevention, and penetration testing. The platform maintains SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications while ensuring GDPR compliance--critical for global hiring programs.

Assess the accuracy metrics that matter:

• What's the plagiarism detection accuracy rate?
• How does the system minimize false positives?
• Can it detect AI-generated code specifically?
• Does it provide session replay for evidence review?
• How does it handle different programming languages?

Consider scalability and candidate experience factors. Can the platform handle your peak assessment volumes? Does it support your required programming languages and frameworks? How invasive is the monitoring from the candidate's perspective?

NIST guidelines emphasize that during identity proofing, applicants provide evidence to credential service providers at specific assurance levels. Your proctoring solution should meet these standards while maintaining usability for legitimate candidates.

Key takeaway: The best proctoring solution balances security with candidate experience, providing courtroom-ready evidence without creating unnecessary friction for honest test-takers.

Proctoring Built for the Next Generation of Developer Hiring

HackerRank's proctoring capabilities represent a fundamental shift in how companies ensure assessment integrity. As Kurian Thomas, Head of Talent Acquisition at Akamai, explains: "The proctoring features of HackerRank have been a game-changer for us. It's not just about filtering out candidates who try to circumvent the system; it's about ensuring that every candidate we consider has been evaluated fairly and accurately. This has a profound impact on the candidate experience, as it reassures them that their skills and potential are what truly matter to us."

The platform's layered approach--from Secure Mode's browser controls to Desktop App Mode's OS-level monitoring--provides flexibility for different security requirements. Combined with 93% accurate plagiarism detection, HackerRank delivers the evidence hiring teams need while respecting candidate privacy and experience.

For organizations ready to move beyond basic proctoring toward comprehensive assessment integrity, HackerRank offers the proven combination of AI accuracy, scalability, and fairness that next-generation developer hiring demands. The platform's widespread adoption--from Fortune 100 enterprises to growing tech companies--demonstrates its effectiveness in protecting assessment integrity without compromising the candidate experience that attracts top technical talent.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of proctoring in AI-native skills evaluations?

Proctoring ensures candidates adhere to guidelines during assessments, preventing cheating and identity fraud, which is crucial as AI-native skills evaluations replace traditional exams.

How does HackerRank's Integrity Stack enhance assessment security?

HackerRank's Integrity Stack uses browser controls, AI monitoring, and OS-level lockdown to prevent cheating, detect suspicious activity, and verify candidate identity, ensuring a fair evaluation process.

What makes HackerRank's AI plagiarism detection unique?

HackerRank's AI plagiarism detection is 93% accurate, using behavioral signals and code similarity to detect unauthorized AI usage, surpassing traditional code matching methods.

How does HackerRank's proctoring compare to competitors like TestGorilla and ProctorU?

HackerRank offers advanced AI capabilities and comprehensive security features, addressing gaps in competitors' offerings, such as basic detection methods and technical issues.

What are the benefits of using HackerRank's proctoring features for companies?

HackerRank's proctoring features help companies maintain assessment integrity, reduce false positives, and improve candidate experience, leading to faster and more accurate hiring decisions.

Sources

1. https://www.hackerrank.com/features/plagiarism-detection
2. https://support.hackerrank.com/articles/9416207922-hackerrank%27s-ai-features
3. https://www.hackerrank.com/blog/putting-integrity-to-the-test-in-fighting-invisible-threats/
4. https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/remote-proctoring-services-for-higher-education
5. https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/technical-skills-assessment-platforms
6. https://support.hackerrank.com/articles/5973590014-hackerrank-desktop-app-mode
7. https://support.hackerrank.com/articles/2545360734-secure-mode
8. https://support.hackerrank.com/articles/1079706165-proctoring-hackerrank-tests
9. https://www.hackerrank.com/blog/hackerranks-ai-day-2025-product-launch-recap/
10. https://support.hackerrank.com/articles/5663779659-proctor-mode#:~:text=Monitor%20for%20violations%20during%20the,anomalies%2C%20and%20intervene%20when%20necessary.
11. https://www.hackerrank.com/blog/how-plagiarism-detection-works-at-hackerrank/
12. https://aclanthology.org/2025.aimecon-wip.11.pdf
13. https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/cheating-detection-skills-assessments/
14. https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/remote-proctoring-in-education/vendor/meazure-learning/product/proctoru-proctoring-platform
15. https://www.hackerearth.com/recruit/comparison/testgorilla-alternative/
16. https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/remote-proctoring-in-education
17. https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/remote-proctoring-in-education/vendor/talview/product/talview-remote-proctoring
18. https://sciety-discovery.elifesciences.org/articles/by?article_doi=10.31234%2Fosf.io%2Fswza3_v1
19. https://www.ivysci.com/en/articles/7507540__The_Problem_with_False_Positives_AI_Detection_Unfairly_Accuses_Scholars_of_AI_Plagiarism
20. https://hackerrank.com/frequently-asked-questions/how-does-hackerrank-keep-my-data-secure
21. https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/63/a/4/final